000			01264cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250122233416.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBiancu, Stefano _eauthor
245	0	0	_aHumanism: The (im)pertinence of an idea for ethics
260			_c2019.
500			_a74
520			_aHumanism is more alive than ever. The last century, ideally opened by the end of the First World War, can be considered the age of the spiritual crisis of Europe and the West but also as the century of humanism(s) and of their return to the intellectual and cultural scene: one can speak here of pedagogical humanism, Christian humanism, Marxist humanism, existential humanism, Anglo-American humanism… To this list we must add the diverse reactions to humanism, including the antihumanisms of the twentieth century and the posthumanisms and transhumanisms of the twenty-first. With regard to this return, what can the category of humanism mean for ethics? How can we examine it? Is humanism (still) relevant for ethics today?
786	0		_nRevue d’éthique et de théologie morale | o 303 | 3 | 2019-08-02 | p. 11-26 | 1266-0078
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-ethique-et-de-theologie-morale-2019-3-page-11?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c716616 _d716616