000			01575cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250123084336.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aVentura, Daniela _eauthor
245	0	0	_aLa concurrence entre voir + infinitif et voir en train de + infinitif
260			_c2019.
500			_a73
520			_aIf we admit with P. Le Goffic (1993 : 277-278. Translation mine) that “the construction with infinitive is the normal expression of perception (effective and imaginary)”, the fact remains that the current language trend [in French] deviates significantly from the correct usage adopted in French normative grammar. This is particularly the case of the verb voir (“to see”) which, while being “the only verb to present almost the whole range of АО [attributes of the object]” (D. Willems and B. Defrancq, 2000 : 10), is not supposed, normatively speaking, to accept durative complementation (“en train de”). However, this construction is attested and seems to be in competition with the infinitive one. Our approach is based on corpus data and aims to answer the following question : could the durative complementation be a (simple) combinatorial variant ?
690			_adurative complementation
690			_aprogressive aspect
690			_aen train de
690			_aVoir
690			_acombinatorial variant
690			_agrammaticalization
786	0		_nLa linguistique | 55 | 2 | 2019-10-24 | p. 35-49 | 0075-966X
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-la-linguistique-2019-2-page-35?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c730475 _d730475