| 000 | 01743cam a2200289 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250123110646.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aCottret, Monique _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aLa justification catholique du tyrannicide |
| 260 | _c2010. | ||
| 500 | _a35 | ||
| 520 | _aRésuméDe 1570 – date à laquelle le pape Pie V fulmine une bulle pour appeler au renversement d’Élisabeth d’Angleterre – jusqu’en 1610, le tyrannicide est essentiellement une pratique catholique, dont sont victimes Guillaume le Taciturne, Henri III et Henri IV et à laquelle Élisabeth et Jacques Ier échappent de justesse. Pourtant une tradition historiographique dominante attribue aux protestants (après 1572) la paternité de cette doctrine. Pourquoi ? Telle est la question soulevée ici. | ||
| 520 | _aFrom 1570 onwards, when Pius V called for the deposition of queen Elizabeth, tyrannicide has been mainly a Catholic concern leading up to the assassination of Henri IV in 1610. William the Silent, Henri III had in turn been its victims. Elizabeth I and James I were also targeted. In spite of all evidence, the prevailing historiography has attributed to Protestants the origin of that tradition. These assumptions should in turn be critically examined. | ||
| 690 | _atyrannicide | ||
| 690 | _apape | ||
| 690 | _amonarchomaques | ||
| 690 | _acatholique | ||
| 690 | _aserment | ||
| 690 | _atyrannicide | ||
| 690 | _acatholic | ||
| 690 | _aoath | ||
| 690 | _amonarchomaques | ||
| 690 | _apope | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nParlement[s], Revue d'histoire politique | HS 6 | 3 | 2010-12-23 | p. 107-117 | 1768-6520 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-parlements1-2010-3-page-107?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c775246 _d775246 |
||