000 01573cam a2200301 4500500
005 20250123151558.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aAnker, Richard
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aMimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de William H. Gass
260 _c2013.
500 _a58
520 _aAlthough everything from Cartesian skepticism to Schoenberg’s twelve-tone system of composition has been evoked in discussing the formal logic of William Gass’s novel, The Tunnel (1995), this paper argues that this logic is fundamentally speculative, in the Hegelian sense of the term, and furthermore that the germ of this logic lies in Plato’s double strategy of exclusion and appropriation of mimesis in The Republic. Far from merely repudiating mimesis, Gass’s (“modernist”) form-alism consists of its speculative purification. The same process is at work with less radical consequences in Gass’s previous novel, Omensetter’s Luck (1966), the onto-mimetological structure of which determines the author’s later work.
690 _aWilliam Gass
690 _amimesis
690 _amythe
690 _amodernisme
690 _aPlaton
690 _anazisme
690 _aPlato
690 _aWilliam Gass
690 _amimesis
690 _aNazism
690 _amyth
690 _amodernism
786 0 _nRevue française d’études américaines | 135 | 1 | 2013-11-01 | p. 51-65 | 0397-7870
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2013-1-page-51?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c857383
_d857383