000			02022cam a2200373 4500500
005			20250123151847.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aDuplay, Mathieu _eauthor
245	0	0	_aEmerson / Marx, actualité du spectre
260			_c2015.
500			_a6
520			_aBased on a detailed comparison of Marx and Emerson, this article suggests that the frequently contradictory ways in which the two writers explore a shared philosophical vocabulary may be a crucial aspect of what makes them relevant today. Both make frequent use of terms such as “mind,” “thought,” and “action,” all borrowed from the tradition of philosophical idealism yet deployed in such a way that their multiple meanings become apparent, simultaneously recalling the uses to which they were put by earlier writers and allowing the reader to imagine new discursive strategies similar to those employed by Emerson and Marx. Ultimately, in spite of their differences, both thinkers seem equally interested in defining speech and writing as modes of action. This hypothesis will be explored by way of a comparison between key passages from Nature and The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte ; meanwhile, an attempt to work out which of the two writers is the more radical in this respect will lead to an unexpected result.
690			_aaction
690			_apensée
690			_aesprit
690			_arévolution
690			_aphilosophie
690			_apolitique
690			_aidéalisme
690			_aRalph Waldo Emerson
690			_aKarl Marx
690			_aaction
690			_amind
690			_aphilosophy
690			_athought
690			_aidealism
690			_arevolution
690			_apolitics
690			_aRalph Waldo Emerson
690			_aKarl Marx
786	0		_nRevue française d’études américaines | 140 | 3 | 2015-06-10 | p. 78-93 | 0397-7870
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2014-3-page-78?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c858099 _d858099