000 01203cam a2200157 4500500
005 20250123160201.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aFuchs, Édith
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aI.3. Antisémitisme : de la « passion criminelle » à « l’errance de la pensée »
260 _c2017.
500 _a79
520 _aSartre showed that anti-Semitism is not an opinion protected by the democratic “freedom of opinion,” but rather a passionate criminal hatred that compels a broad existential choice, that of a passionate way of life. In contrast, Peter Trawny, in his recent effort to save Heidegger, wishes to see in Heidegger’s ingrained Nazism a “wandering” that is in keeping with his “greatness of thought,” which could not be burdened by reasons or arguments.By juxtaposing two such completely opposing views, we seek to bring to light several of the conditions under which a historical configuration such as the Nazi genocide may be addressed by philosophy.
786 0 _nRevue d’Histoire de la Shoah | 207 | 2 | 2017-10-01 | p. 53-68 | 2111-885X
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah-2017-2-page-53?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c872437
_d872437