À partir de quels critères les apprenants évaluent-ils le « soutien organisationnel » à leur formation ? (notice n° 1127851)
[ vue normale ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02346cam a2200265 4500500 |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20250413030453.0 |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
Authentication code | dc |
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Bosset, Isabelle |
Relator term | author |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | À partir de quels critères les apprenants évaluent-ils le « soutien organisationnel » à leur formation ? |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2019.<br/> |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | 21 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | Cette contribution concerne les critères à partir desquels un collaborateur suivant une formation externe à son entreprise évalue le « soutien » que celle-ci accorde à sa formation. Nous nous intéressons aux pratiques organisationnelles (« soutien organisationnel ») à l’égard de la formation du collaborateur et aux critères à partir desquels il les évalue. Nos résultats nous permettent d’avancer deux hypothèses : 1) que les pratiques organisationnelles censées soutenir la formation sont diversement appréciées en fonction de certains critères ; 2) que de cette évaluation résulte une perception globale et individuelle de soutien. Ainsi, il ne peut exister de soutien organisationnel à la formation universelle. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | The issue we address concerns the criteria employees use to evaluate the so-called “organizational support” given by their employer when in training. In this study, we look at the types of organizational practices (“organizational support”) put in place when an employee is in training, and at the criteria from which these adults evaluate them. Our results allow us to put forward two hypotheses: 1) organizational practices that are supposed to support the training are diversely appreciated and evaluated; and 2) from this evaluation stems a global and individual perception of support. Thus, there can be no universal “support” of training. |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | attentes en termes de soutien |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | critères d’évaluation |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | pratiques organisationnelles à l’égard de la formation |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | soutien organisationnel perçu |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | evaluation criteria |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | organizational support |
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | perceived organizational support to training |
700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Bourgeois, Étienne |
Relator term | author |
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
Note | Savoirs | 48 | 3 | 2019-02-12 | p. 71-88 | 1763-4229 |
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-savoirs-2018-3-page-71?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-savoirs-2018-3-page-71?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux