At the Origins of Sophistry: The Revelation of Future Contingents from a Reading of Richard Fitzralph’s Commentary on the Sentences (II) (notice n° 138270)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01117cam a2200157 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250112022059.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Genest, Jean-François |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | At the Origins of Sophistry: The Revelation of Future Contingents from a Reading of Richard Fitzralph’s Commentary on the Sentences (II) |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 20 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | In his lecture on the Sentences (I, q. 16), Richard Fitzralph has built up, with regard to the revelation of future contingents, a subtle casuistry. From the idea that the revelation does not eliminate their contingency, he comes, among other radical conclusions, to the one that God might be deceptive. This thesis, which is a possible outcome of the sometimes so-called « Ockhamist » theory of future contingents, was taken up by Adam Wodeham and Robert Holcot. |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge | Volume 70 | 1 | 2003-01-01 | p. 317-346 | 0373-5478 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-d-histoire-doctrinale-et-litteraire-du-moyen-age-2003-1-page-317?lang=en">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-d-histoire-doctrinale-et-litteraire-du-moyen-age-2003-1-page-317?lang=en</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux