Local Resistance to Wind Energy Projects in Languedoc-Roussillon (notice n° 486701)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02094cam a2200169 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121072517.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Chataignier, Stéphane |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Local Resistance to Wind Energy Projects in Languedoc-Roussillon |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2003.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 7 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Wind energy seems to be the only option for France to comply to the European directive on renewable energies’ promotion (which seeks to shift the renewable energy-based electricity production’s share from 15 % to 21 %). At the beginning of 2000, the Jospin government decided to change from an invitation to tender (2005 Eole Program) to a policy based on guaranteed buyback prices of the energy produced. The buyback price was fixed at a very rewarding level. Numerous companies thus began to prospect intensively the French territory in search of favourable sites. Not surprisingly, it induced local controversies. This paper is based on a case study in Languedoc-Roussillon undertaken during of the first semester of 2002, and highlights an interesting “moment” when the “new forms of deliberation” or of planning appeared to be forgotten and replaced by a pure market-like rationality in the context of the electricity market’s deregulation. Those economic tools are powerful but their confrontation with territorial logics, by taking no account of the territories’ projects, generates “unacceptability.” Above all they induce the hostility of local actors who denounce the opacity and the “anarchy” of the system. In order to overcome the crisis, land-planning is rediscovered as a necessity. However this does not result on a return back to square one, but in a policy mix combining competition, decentralization and “incentive” planning. Will this be sufficient to limit the “collateral damages” of the guaranteed prices’ system? |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Jobert, Arthur |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Flux | o 54 | 4 | 2003-12-01 | p. 36-48 | 1154-2721 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-flux1-2003-4-page-36?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-flux1-2003-4-page-36?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux