The contribution of imaging to neuropsychology (notice n° 574168)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01966cam a2200205 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121133308.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Folville, Adrien |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The contribution of imaging to neuropsychology |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2018.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 82 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Neuroimaging tools (MRI, PET, EEG and MEG) have been widely used within the scientific community for more than four decades. Beyond its medical use, imagery has become a complementary approach to many research areas, as is the case for neuropsychology. Nowadays, however, whether imagery has been contributing to our understanding of how the human mind generates behaviors and thoughts remains a topic of debate. Notably, it has been argued that neuroimaging ( e.g. fMRI) provided insights into the brain localization of human behavioral processes rather than providing information on how these processes were implemented. On December 1, 2017, the French Language Society of Neuropsychology organized a debate with Bernard Laurent (Saint-Etienne) and Martial Van der Linden (Liege and Geneva) that aimed to shed light on this controversial topic. The debate was based on a list of items to be discussed. Through an overview of their own research, each speaker discussed the relevance of using neuroimaging as a means of understanding the origins of our behavior. Bernard Laurent explained how imagery tools have enhanced our theoretical and clinical knowledge of cognition. In contrast, some limitations of the current use of neuroimaging were noted by Martial Van der Linden. This article sums up the points raised in the debate. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | cognition |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | neuroimaging |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | neuropsychology |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Fortier, Jonathan |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | Revue de neuropsychologie | Volume 10 | 1 | 2018-03-23 | p. 28-32 | 2101-6739 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-neuropsychologie-2018-1-page-28?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-neuropsychologie-2018-1-page-28?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux