Bassins résidentiels en Belgique : deux méthodes, une réalité ? (notice n° 599559)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 03044cam a2200373 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121153421.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Adam, Arnaud |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Bassins résidentiels en Belgique : deux méthodes, une réalité ? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2018.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 25 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Les flux migratoires sont souvent privilégiés pour appréhender l’organisation spatiale des territoires. Avec l’explosion des grandes bases de données et des technologies de l’information, de nouveaux outils (méthodes et données) sont mis à disposition des chercheurs. Deux méthodes de partitionnement spatial sont éprouvées sur la même base de données relationnelles : Anabel (développée par l’ Insee) et la méthode de Louvain (issue des sciences des données). L’objectif est de comparer leurs avantages et inconvénients, tout en apportant une lecture géographique critique des résultats obtenus à partir d’un jeu de données théoriques, et d’un jeu de données réelles (migrations inter-communales en Belgique, sans tenir compte des migrations intra-communales). Les résultats rappellent que partitionner un espace n’est pas un exercice anodin, que les résultats dépendent fortement des méthodes et seuils utilisés, et que la prise de décision liée au partitionnement du territoire devrait toujours être prudente et avisée. |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Migration flows are often used to capture the spatial organization of territories. With the explosive growth of large databases and information technologies, new tools (methods and data) are now available for researchers. Two spatial partitioning methods are here compared: Anabel (developed by Insee) and the Louvain method (anchored in data sciences). The aim is to compare their advantages and disadvantages, while providing a critical geographical understanding of the results. Two databases are used: A theoretical and a real world data set (inter-communal migrations in Belgium, excluding the intramunicipal migrations). Results remind us that partitioning space is not a trivial exercise, that the results depend strongly on the methods and thresholds used, and that decisions related to the partitioning of a territory should always be done in a cautious and informed manner. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | méthode de Louvain |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | partitionnement spatial |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Belgique |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | migration |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | interaction |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Anabel |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Louvain method |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | migration |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | interaction |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Anabel |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | spatial partitionnement |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Belgium |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Charlier, Julien |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Debuisson, Marc |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Duprez, Jean-Paul |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Reginster, Isabelle |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Thomas, Isabelle |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | L’Espace géographique | 47 | 1 | 2018-06-21 | p. 35-50 | 0046-2497 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-espace-geographique-2018-1-page-35?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-espace-geographique-2018-1-page-35?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux