Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Abelard and Boethius: Between Nominalism and Realism, a Singular Response to Porphyry’s Questionnaire

Par : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2012. Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : When faced with the great aporias of the Aristotelian logical corpus, Boethius elaborated a double “theory of the unique subject” which, as I demonstrate, Abelard not only did not support, but, in fact, completely rejected. I also demonstrate that Abelard, in elaborating his own response to Porphyry’s questionnaire, adopts a position as incompatible with Boecian realism as it is with which we have come to call “Nominalism” (thinking first and foremost of Ockham).
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

71

When faced with the great aporias of the Aristotelian logical corpus, Boethius elaborated a double “theory of the unique subject” which, as I demonstrate, Abelard not only did not support, but, in fact, completely rejected. I also demonstrate that Abelard, in elaborating his own response to Porphyry’s questionnaire, adopts a position as incompatible with Boecian realism as it is with which we have come to call “Nominalism” (thinking first and foremost of Ockham).

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025